|
FLOATING
TREATMENT WETLANDS ISLAND |
VETIVER PLANT |
|
Do something on the unsightly mud flats during
low tides !! These unwelcome views from the
waterfront promenade can be replaced with
floating wetland islands that floats or just
laid over the mud flats during low tides, thus
only the greenery view is visually exposed to
the on lookers !!
Constructed
treatment wetlands have traditionally involved
the use of free floating aquatic plants or
sediment-rooted emergent wetland plants, either
with water flowing through the root zone
(subsurface flow) or amongst the stems (surface
flow).
Floating treatment
wetlands (FTWs) are an innovative variant on
these systems that employ rooted, emergent
plants such as the Vetiver grass etc. growing as
a floating mat on the surface of the water
rather than rooted in the sediments.
Because of this
feature, floating treatment wetlands offer great
promise for rainfall driven storm water
treatment applications as they are little
affected by fluctuations in water levels that
may submerge and adversely stress bottom-rooted
plants. |
|
Over
the past two decades, artificially created
floating wetlands have been studied in various
parts of the world for a range of applications,
such as water quality improvement, habitat
creation, and aesthetic enhancement in the
following treatment applications.
• Combined stormwater-sewer overflow
• Sewage
• Acid mine drainage
• Piggery effluent
• Poultry processing wastewater
• Water supply Reservoirs |
 |
 |
Compared to conventional pond and wetland
systems, FTWs are considered to possess a number
of advantages that may enhance certain
contaminant removal processes. The cover and
shelter provided by the floating mat promotes
conditions conducive to settling by reducing
turbulence and mixing induced by wind, waves and
thermal mixing. |
|
Compared to conventional sediment-rooted
wetlands that are predominantly restricted to
water depths of less than 0.5m, FTWs can be
constructed deeper to provide extra water
volume, reduce flow velocities and enhance
settling. |
 |
Plant
roots are believed to play a key role in the
treatment processes within FTWs by virtue of the
contact that is afforded as the water passes
directly through the network of hanging roots
that develops beneath the floating mat. Plant
roots provide a living surface area for
development of biofilms containing communities
of attached-growth micro-organisms responsible
for a number of important treatment processes.
The thick network of roots and associated
biofilms are effective at physically trapping
particulates within the water column, which
subsequently slough off the roots as heavy
particles that are more amenable to settling. |
|
There is some potential for incorporation of
materials with a high metal sorption capacity
within the floating mat of FTW in order to
enhance removal of dissolved copper and zinc.
Potentially suitable media includes zeolites,
vermiculites, bauxsol, activated carbon, and
bio-sorbents such as peat, plant, algal and
shell materials. The effectiveness of this
approach will be somewhat limited by the amount
of interaction between the stormwater and the
sorbent material contained within the floating
mat. The pumping and circulation of water
vertically through the floating mat may be
required to optimize metal removal through such
a process. |
|
 |
|
A number of questions exist surrounding the
design and practical implementation of FTWs as a
stormwater quality improvement device. At this
stage, FTWs show great promise for applications
where they are retro-fitted onto existing
detention ponds in order to enhance their
treatment performance, In two stage pond
systems, it is suggested that the most suitable
location for FTW elements will be within the
second pond following the sediment removal
forebay. FTWs may also be beneficial for
upgrading surface flow wetlands that have
suffered vegetative decline due to inappropriate
water depths or for incorporation into deep
water zones. |
|
 |
|
A conceptual stormwater treatment train has been
suggested for newly constructed systems that
consist of a forebay upfront of course sediments
and flow attenuation, a surface flow wetland for
some removal of organics, suspended solids and
nutrients (this component may not be necessary),
followed by a FTW for fine particulate and metal
removal, The final stage of the treatment system
would consist of an open water pond to
facilitate re-aeration of the water prior to
discharge. |
|
Fundamental experimental work is required in
order to define the relationship between loading
rate per unit surface area of FTW (either
hydraulic or contaminant loading rate) and the
typical removal rates or effluent concentrations
that can be expected from such systems. This
would then enable the surface area of FTW
required to achieve a given effluent
concentration to be estimated for design
purposes. |
 |
|
In short, FTW is still a work in progress and
empirical approach is the current design basis
to achieve a desired pollutant removal
objective. |