|
Written and prepared by Jered Hansen
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
Introduction
Sky rocketing water front
real-estate prices along with an increasing amount
of Jet-Ski owners has lead to speculation and
concern on the effect of Jet-Ski generated waves on
shoreline erosion. This erosion not only causes a
loss of land but also causes habitat destruction,
sediment resuspension, and the release of nutrients
(phosphorous and nitrogen) which promote algae
blooms. Boats are know to cause a slight increase
in shoreline erosion, but the effects of Jet-Ski
generated waves have yet to be determined. The
continuous crashing of waves on the shoreline
naturally causes it to erode and wash away, but are
Jet-Ski's inflicting a significant impact on the
waves that bombard the shore? This project will
reveal if Jet-Ski generated waves are a legitimate
cause for concern along precious waterfront
property.
Whitewater Lake
Lake Characteristics:
Whitewater Lake covers 640 square acres and is
located 50 miles south east of Madison. The Lake
has a mean depth of 11 feet and a max depth of 38
feet. The surrounding shoreline of Whitewater Lake
is primarily taken up by residential housing and
restaurants. The majority of houses surrounding the
lake are used for weekend vacation homes.
Activities such as boating, swimming, and fishing
are enjoyed here. The increase in residential
housing has resulted in much more traffic on
Whitewater Lake. Making up a large portion of this
increased traffic are Jet-Skiers which flock to the
Lake in an attempt to unleash their wild side.
Objective:
My intentions for this project are to compare
boat generated waves with jet-ski generated waves.
These sources of waves will be analyzed and compared
by means of wave kinematics (sediment resuspension)
and wave dynamics (wave energy density and wave
power).
Motivation:
Whitewater Lake was chosen for my research
project because a good friend of mine, along with
his family, owns a house on the lake. I often come
here during the summer months to boat and Jet-Ski.
With shoreline property on this Lake doubling nearly
every ten years, the concept of shoreline erosion is
a primary concern for many lake front property
owners. Sediment resuspension is another negative
effect that induced waves can cause on lakes. It is
directly related to the bottom water velocity which
is increased by waves. Out of curiosity, I want to
assure myself that the recreation I so often seek on
this lake is not causing an increased effect on
shoreline erosion or the endangerment of the lake.
Below, you will find an aerial photo Whitewater
Lake.
Data Collection
The data was collected by choosing
three locations on a dock in which the water depth
was known and considered to be deep, intermediate,
and shallow. (see image below) At each of these
locations I had my partner drive the Jet-Ski by at
velocities of 15 MPH, 30 MPH, and 45 MPH. Wave
characteristics, such as wave period, wave height,
and wave length, were collected for the generated
waves of the three different velocities. The wave
characteristics of each velocity at each location
was were measured several times to assure the
accuracy the the recorded value.

Calculations
Characteristics of
waves generated by a Jet-Ski:
Energy Density
Energy density is an important
characteristic to consider when analyzing waves
because it's directly related to a waves ability to
erode the shoreline. The energy density can be
calculated from a known wave height by the following
equation:

Equation 1
where ρ = 1000 kg/m3
and g = 9.81 m/s2.
Wave data from Jet-Ski generated waves have been
collected and placed in the table bellow (Table 1).
In addition, the energy densities for Jet-Ski waves
were calculated using equation 1 and are also
included in Table 1. It should be noted that the
wave height in the table is considered to be the
maximum wave height generated from the given
velocity.
Wave
Power
The power
generated by a wave is also a direct indicator of
the erosion impact it will cause on the shoreline.
Wave power can be calculated by using the following
equation:

Equation 2
where c=L/T, n=0.5 for deep water, 1
for shallow water, and can be calculated by the
equation 3 for intermediate water. Since the wave
power should essentially be the same at deep,
intermediate, and shallow water, the average wave
power for each velocity will be calculated and used
in the analysis. The wave power has been calculated
for the different velocities at each location and
placed in Table 1.

Sediment Resuspension
Fine sediments carry most of the
contaminants that are introduced into lakes. When
these sediments are resuspended the contaminants
associated with them are reintroduced into the
water. Also, when sediments are resuspended, they
can be further eroded or transported throughout the
lake. For this reason it is critical to limit the
amount of sediment resuspension caused by human
induced waves. Sediment resuspension is directly
related to the lakes bottom water velocity. This
bottom velocity (See Table 1) can be calculated
using the wave calculator or the following equation
from the course notes:

Equation 4
Table 1: Collected and collected
data from Jet-Ski generated waves
|
|
Deep Water |
Intermediate Water |
Shallow Water |
|
Velocity (mph) |
15 |
30 |
45 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
|
Velocity (m/s) |
6.70560 |
13.41120 |
20.11680 |
6.70560 |
13.41120 |
20.11680 |
6.70560 |
13.41120 |
20.11680 |
|
Depth (m) |
1.82880 |
1.82880 |
1.82880 |
0.45720 |
0.45720 |
0.45720 |
0.10150 |
0.10150 |
0.10150 |
|
Wave Period (sec) |
1.2200 |
1.0400 |
0.8400 |
1.4300 |
1.3000 |
1.2000 |
1.3000 |
1.2000 |
1.1000 |
|
Wave Height (m) |
0.1251 |
0.1016 |
0.0813 |
0.1063 |
0.0799 |
0.0667 |
0.1327 |
0.1043 |
0.0910 |
|
Wave Length (m) |
2.3250 |
1.6890 |
1.1020 |
2.0570 |
1.5990 |
1.0910 |
1.1610 |
0.9720 |
0.7570 |
|
Approx. Distance from Jet-Ski (m) |
6.0000 |
6.0000 |
6.0000 |
45.0000 |
45.0000 |
45.0000 |
46.0000 |
46.0000 |
46.0000 |
|
Wave Energy Density of Jet-Ski (kN/m2) |
0.019171 |
0.012645 |
0.008093 |
0.013842 |
0.007811 |
0.005450 |
0.021571 |
0.013326 |
0.010144 |
|
Wave Power of Jet-Ski (kN/m2/sec) |
0.017000 |
0.008970 |
0.004970 |
0.017000 |
0.008970 |
0.004970 |
0.017000 |
0.008970 |
0.004970 |
|
Bottom Velocity (m/s) |
0.000000 |
0.000000 |
0.000000 |
0.154000 |
0.097000 |
0.042000 |
0.362000 |
0.348000 |
0.300000 |
Characteristics of
waves generated by a
boat:
Energy Density
The characteristics of boat
generated waves will be calculated using theoretical
formulas and ultimately compared to the
characteristics of Jet-Ski waves. Before
calculating the energy density, the wave height must
first be obtained using the following equation which
was created by Bhomik et.al. in 1991.

Equation 5
Hm
= maximum wave height
V = boat speed speed
x = distance to the
measurement point in meters
Lv = length of the boat in
meters = 5.5 meters
D = draft of the boat in
meters = 0.4 meters. This value was estimated
through using Bhowmik’s data related to boat speed,
and size
The energy density can now be
computed using equation 1. The results can be seen
in Table 2.
Wave Power
The wave
power can be computed through implementation of the
wave calculator. The requirements of the wave
calculator are to input the deep water wave height,
deep water wave period, and local depth. The wave
calculator will then compute the corresponding wave
length which is required to calculate the wave
power. I will assume that the deep water wave
height is 93.3% of the max wave height which is the
case for the recorded data from Jet-Ski waves. I
will also make the assumption that the deep water
wave periods are roughly the same for boat and
Jet-Ski waves. The resulting computations for wave
energy density and wave power can be seen in Table 2
below.
Sediment Resuspension
The
calculated wave characteristics of boat generated
waves can be plugged into the wave calculator or
equation 4 to obtained the bottom water velocity.
The results can be seen in Table 2.
Table 2: Calculated data for
boat generated waves
|
|
Deep Water |
Intermediate Water |
Shallow Water |
|
Velocity (mph) |
15 |
30 |
45 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
15 |
30 |
45 |
|
Velocity (m/s) |
6.70560 |
13.41120 |
20.11680 |
6.70560 |
13.41120 |
20.11680 |
6.70560 |
13.41120 |
20.11680 |
|
Depth (m) |
1.82880 |
1.82880 |
1.82880 |
0.45720 |
0.45720 |
0.45720 |
0.10150 |
0.10150 |
0.10150 |
|
Wave Period (sec) |
1.2200 |
1.0400 |
0.8400 |
1.4300 |
1.3000 |
1.2000 |
1.3000 |
1.2000 |
1.1000 |
|
Approx. Distance from Jet-Ski (m) |
6.0000 |
6.0000 |
6.0000 |
45.0000 |
45.0000 |
45.0000 |
46.0000 |
46.0000 |
46.0000 |
|
Wave Height of boat (kN/m2) |
0.1299 |
0.1022 |
0.0888 |
0.1066 |
0.0839 |
0.0729 |
0.1392 |
0.1095 |
0.0952 |
|
Wave Energy Density of boat (kN/m2) |
0.020669 |
0.012794 |
0.009664 |
0.013932 |
0.008624 |
0.006514 |
0.023744 |
0.014697 |
0.011102 |
|
Wave Length of boat (m) |
2.325000 |
1.689000 |
1.102000 |
2.057000 |
1.599000 |
1.091000 |
1.161000 |
0.972000 |
0.757000 |
|
Wave Power of boat (kN/m2/sec) |
0.018130 |
0.009567 |
0.005666 |
0.018130 |
0.009567 |
0.005666 |
0.018130 |
0.009567 |
0.005666 |
|
Bottom Velocity (m/s) |
0.00000 |
0.00000 |
0.00000 |
0.16100 |
0.09700 |
0.04600 |
0.36200 |
0.34800 |
0.32100 |
Results
Wave
Energy Density Comparison

Wave
Power Comparison

Sediment Resuspension
Comparison

Conclusion
In conclusion, the effect on
shoreline erosion created by boat generated waves is
slightly greater than waves generated by Jet-Ski's.
However, the results prove to be surprisingly
close. The small difference in the wave
characterizes was initially springing to me, but
made more sense when I considered that the Jet-Ski
used in the data collection was about ten feet long
(three seater) which is bigger then the average
Jet-Ski.
The energy density for boat waves
was larger then Jet-Ski waves at all water depths.
This is due to the slightly larger wave heights that
a boat emits. It is evident that the energy density
emitted by both vessels in intermediate water is
about half that of the energy density in shallow
water. The deep water values consistently lie in
between the two. Through research, it was also
brought to my attention that vessel generated waves
cause significantly more damage to the shoreline in
narrow water ways then they do wide open water.
Both of these are reasons why "No Wake" signs are
placed at shallow and narrow locations of a body of
water. This statement holds true for Whitewater
Lake. If you look at the aerial photo of Whitewater
Lake you will notice that it becomes narrow at two
different locations in the middle in the middle of
the Lake. Both of these locations have floating "No
Wake" signs. These signs have been strategically
placed in locations where Jet-Ski and Boat waves can
produce relatively large energy densities. It is
also apparent, from the graph, that the energy
density from going 15 MPH is about twice the
magnitude of the energy density from going 45 MPH.
This indicates that if an individual driving a
boat/jet-ski while passing a "No Wake" zone simply
slows down to a speed considered to be acceptable
(around 15 MPH) then they will be inducing more harm
on the shoreline then if they were going full
speed.
The wave power graph provides
similar characteristics to those just discussed.
The wave power generated from boat is slightly more
then the power generated from a Jet-Ski at all
velocities. Also, a higher wave power results from
a slower velocity which signifies more potential for
shoreline erosion. The wave power created from a
vessel traveling 15 MPH is three times the wave
power created when traveling 45 MPH. This may seem
counterintuitive to many but it was a common thing
observed throughout the project.
The bottom velocity of the water was
nearly identical for boat and Jet-Ski generated
waves at all vessel velocities and locations. The
velocity at the bottom also increases with a
decrease in depth. This goes along with what we
were taught in the course notes. It came as a
surprise that the bottom velocity more then doubled
from intermediate to shallow water. This is a large
jump when considering that the difference in
location of the two recorded data sets was less then
one meter apart.
Causes for Error:
Assuming that
the deep water wave periods are roughly the same
for the boat and Jet-Ski waves.
Human error
when colleting the characteristics of Jet-Ski
generated waves.
Sediment resuspension was analyzed by
computing the bottom velocity of water produced
by waves. This does not take into account
factors such as cohesion and particle size.
Interference due to wind generated waves may
have disrupted the accuracy of the data
collected.
While this project was carefully carried out,
there were clearly assumptions made along that way
that could have affected the quality of the
results. This research project was not meant to
product results that are 100% accurate, but merely
to provide a rough analysis of wave characteristics
for boat and Jet-Ski waves.
|